WHEN BLOGGERS ARE BELITTLED BY A TROLL

Posted: Thursday, August 23, 2012 by RoNRoNTuRoN in
5

This guy is not just a senator. He’s also an ignorant, insulting neanderthal.This is serious. 

His statement is belittling. And at the same time funny.  The ignorant value of his statements is really irrational, that i can't help but sometimes give an awe when I see him. Poor fellow, fighting for what he believes is right and continuously gatling self defense statements to rationalize himself, which is in the first place, fundamentally irrational. 

To answer your question, Mr. Senator, the reason you should have quoted your statements, even if it comes from a blogger "lang" is basic respect and humility. It takes so much time, effort and energy to think, research and make a thoughtful argument, and even bloggers do spend priceless efforts in writing their blogs, which you would just effortlessly steal without due recognition. 

Your train of thoughts gives a clear picture of your personal values regarding honesty and stealing. If you could easily steal words from blogs, that made me think how effortlessly you can steal anything that is not yours and not giving any damn about it. How much money have you stolen from the Filipinos?. 

What are your thoughts as a blogger/blog reader?




5 comments:

  1. It does not matter what form of writing or publication a statement was made: be it in a blog, newspaper, article, or literary research. The basic issue here is the acknowledgment of one's works, which the funny Senator and his seemingly intellectual lawyer seem not to possess, or at the very least, exude.

  1. Guyrony says:

    The guy does not know anything of copyright, infringement, triangulation, reference, and plagiarism.

    A ditzy blonde with a mustache.

  1. MEcoy says:

    i've been hearing a lot about this that quote he said was kinda offenssive

  1. 1st. I would like to hear his apology to Ms. Pope. A privileged speech not some message drafted by his staff in Facebook.

    2nd. I would like him to admit that indeed, he quoted a blogger. His staff already admitted it, and so he must acknowledge it.

    ---

    in other articles, his Chief of Staff is justifying that it is okay to Plagiarize. ilk! I swear if "Expression of Absurd Convictions" is grounds for disbarment, I'll be the first to file it to that lawyer!

  1. There's a big difference between a blogger and someone who has a blog.

    Ron is a blogger. Sarah Pope is a blogger. What they write is right. They have authority in what they write. They are as good as journalist and writers. Not everyone who has a blog should be considered a blogger.

    Me, I'm just someone who has a blog.

    But whether one is a blogger or has a blog, we are all concerned netizens of the blogosphere, and what they did is unacceptable.

    Freakin' a-hole Sotto messed up with a blogger.

    He is supposed to be a guardian of laws, of what is right and wrong, and yet his bloated speeches and unimaginative dim-witted speechwriters live on plagiarism.

    What a shame. Ipagmamalaki pa nila mga achievements nila from this Big University and from this Big Time School. T*ngna nila! Bobo talaga sila. Ipinanganak na talaga silang walang imagination at creativity.

    Horde of thieves and liars!

    Argh!